End of the job
Koontz - It's the end of the job this week, at least for my part. The project isn't done and the client isn't ready for final inspections, but the budget is shot and the client doesn't feel he can afford help any longer.
In our area the city development code states that if you don't have inspections every six months, at a minimum, you must reapply for permits and pay fees again to re-activate your permit. That's the down side to my leaving the job now, the client probably can't get to his next inspection on his own. On the other hand, this client isn't all that concerned with inspectors and code issues. I discovered upon my return to the job this week that he had removed an interior wall that was not part of his original plans or permits. Just got motivated apparently! I would just as soon not be present when an inspector walks through the project again!
As a contractor I recognize that it is to my benefit to keep inspectors' on my side. I do project walk-throughs with inspectors before I even begin a job, just to ensure that I won't have trouble down the road. Clients have a different attitude toward the permit/inspection issue and often complain about what they see as restrictions and delays brought about by code issues. In the best of all worlds, these issues are for the health and safety of the client. In the worst case, they are revenue generating projects for the city department. Either way, there are only so many ways to circumvent an inspector's request for something. Even then I can usually only accomplish it with a good attitude with the inspector and alot of evidence for my side of the discussion. Notice I said discussion-it's a rare case when you can argue with an inspector and win! And the boss will almost always back his inspector, not the contractor.
City government is a bureaucracy-not a democracy, contrary to popular opinion. So don't push your luck if you don't have to. And don't ask your contractor to risk their relationship with inspectors they will have to continue working with after they leave your job. Unless you can pay me enough to retire after your job, I can't afford it.
In our area the city development code states that if you don't have inspections every six months, at a minimum, you must reapply for permits and pay fees again to re-activate your permit. That's the down side to my leaving the job now, the client probably can't get to his next inspection on his own. On the other hand, this client isn't all that concerned with inspectors and code issues. I discovered upon my return to the job this week that he had removed an interior wall that was not part of his original plans or permits. Just got motivated apparently! I would just as soon not be present when an inspector walks through the project again!
As a contractor I recognize that it is to my benefit to keep inspectors' on my side. I do project walk-throughs with inspectors before I even begin a job, just to ensure that I won't have trouble down the road. Clients have a different attitude toward the permit/inspection issue and often complain about what they see as restrictions and delays brought about by code issues. In the best of all worlds, these issues are for the health and safety of the client. In the worst case, they are revenue generating projects for the city department. Either way, there are only so many ways to circumvent an inspector's request for something. Even then I can usually only accomplish it with a good attitude with the inspector and alot of evidence for my side of the discussion. Notice I said discussion-it's a rare case when you can argue with an inspector and win! And the boss will almost always back his inspector, not the contractor.
City government is a bureaucracy-not a democracy, contrary to popular opinion. So don't push your luck if you don't have to. And don't ask your contractor to risk their relationship with inspectors they will have to continue working with after they leave your job. Unless you can pay me enough to retire after your job, I can't afford it.
permalink


